The Patriot Act has a better purpose than can be imagined.
A case was brought on his behalf because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed against him along with other problems that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The evening before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him. It is thought that it was only done so that the Supreme Court will never hear the full case as the Bush Administration would have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed that had to accomplish using the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been charged with lesser and less crimes that are specific Attorney General Ashcroft had stated when he was detained that the evidence against Padilla was overwhelming. Before he had been set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that due to the torture he was put through plus the period of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to extend it to the 8th of December, giving the power to your Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our rights that are constitutional. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the past day regarding the Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. With this specific extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. It and Democrats argued against the extension when it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted for. However, that which was a shock to a lot of was the known proven fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension associated with the Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the best ranking democrat on the Intelligence Committee, would like to see this extension most of the way right through to 2013. A number of the 27 Republicans who voted against the extension, such as Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face the best threat of out-of-control prosecutions plus the likelihood of out-of-control spy networks effect that is taking.
Groups like the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) additionally the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform associated with Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will take benefit of the balance and use of this capacity to trouble innocent people in the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee on the significance of reform associated with Patriot Act, arguing that the us government tabs on communications with no proof is a violation of this peoples that are american basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to obtain reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion to the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to college homework helper report to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are influenced by the charged power of the Patriot Act.
for instance, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens trying to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the us are being scrutinized beneath the new requirement system associated with the Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the us Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) managed to make it clear if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility then they will get disapproval. More stringent government standards and thorough criminal background checks are only another obstacle developed by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also opposed to almost all of the checks and balances from the Bill of Rights that has been placed into destination to protect citizens’ privacy. In those days, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, such as the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel a discomfort with what they do because their actions are susceptible to review if the government suspects these are typically participating in anything terrorist related. For Internet users, it opens the doorway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also place in the midst of the arguments are companies and public libraries that have to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, at the request of federal law enforcement agencies, without giving any notification with their customers.
In my opinion that one facets of the Patriot Act are feasible, but only with intensive oversight not just from Congress, but additionally from the Supreme Court. Congress can may play a role by ensuring that the statutory laws they pass usually do not not in favor of the protections promised to Americans within the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments regarding the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to make sure that the Constitution is upheld even though it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which are American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it really is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, property and liberty has changed into greed. Terrorist acts resistant to the US terrify many Americans, but in many cases, power and money scares them more. The folks vote to own government representation however the people need to be more involved with the decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That can simply be done if people get more involved in the process that is political not just be happy with what are the results.
The expression “land regarding the free” is employed too generously. Just how it is now, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country is short for and deprives us all of your civil liberties. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. If the Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the people it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president really should not be the deciding element in deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving a person such a title strips them of basic human rights. If it’s unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes resistant to the people of the world they are occupying, it must be unacceptable for authorities to make use of tactics which are considered torture when attempting to elicit information from a person, whether see your face be an American citizen or not.
A brief history associated with Patriot Act actually goes back to your century that is eighteenth different laws put into place during war time and energy to protect the usa.
The protection of your nation could be the highest together with most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are supposed to be within the interest that is best for the citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. People with this degree of power sometimes pay attention to your whole without rational additionally the individual has to pay the price. There ought to be a limit from the power regarding the government, if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and search for property are in jeopardy we must consider the rational the us government uses when governing this nation. We can’t as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being done. To be able to elicit change, we have to stand up and do something about it.